Controversial filmmaker Kim Ki-duk's latest film, Pieta, recently beat Paul Thomas Anderson's masterpiece The Master to the Venice Film Festival's top prize, the Golden Lion. Did the film deserve it? It certainly wasn't better than The Master, but it did deserve it. Pieta is not a pleasant film to watch, it is very disturbing. But the incredibly underrated South Korean director does manage to draw some grand emotion. It's not on a very large scale, and on an obviously small budget, but that doesn't stop it's brilliantly crafted brutality from consuming you. The story is that of a young man who works for loan sharks, brutally threatening debtors into paying back. One day, a woman appears and begins to follow him, claiming to be his long lost mother. He at first treats her with contempt and disgust, but her motherly love touches him, and his heart begins to soften for this woman who he doesn't entirely trust. The highlight is the two leading performances, with the ruthless protagonist Kang-do portrayed brilliantly by Lee Jung-jin, and his potential mother acted lovingly by Jo Min-su. They have incredible chemistry together, the likes of which I have not seen for quite some time. They project their emotions at each other and at the audience very well, playing very human and very real characters. The most brilliant aspect of the film, however, is the disturbing nature, which is achieved by not showing the violence graphically. Most other movies with similar violent situations such as Saw show it too graphically, which does not scare, it simply disgusts. The way the camera pans away or just isn't in the same room at these moments adds a sort of intense ferocity to it, something which those other films are sorely missing. Another great aspect is the absence of music throughout most of the film, which adds to the intense atmosphere. Overall, an incredibly crafted film with some great performances. I just wish it would get a wider release, that's all.
9/10
The Art of Cinema
Film Reviews
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Monday, April 29, 2013
Oblivion
A science fiction film about a post apocalyptic world starring Tom Cruise directed by the guy who directed Disney's Tron: Legacy. Doesn't sound very enticing on paper now, does it? When I saw the list of cast and crew, I was very disheartened. Then I saw the trailer. The trailer gave me hope for this film. It promised that Oblivion would be a visual odyssey through a gorgeously designed science fiction world, similar in style to the great science fiction films of the past, such as 2001 or Blade Runner. So how did it actually turn out? Visually, it's gorgeous. So much care was taken with every single shot and effect. The CGI is probably even better than Avatar. Every destroyed building, every wrecked monument looks very real. I highly regret not seeing this in IMAX. These are the kind of movies that they should shoot in IMAX, not films like The Dark Knight Rises. Sure, that was visually interesting, but there was nothing really amazing in it that would make me want to see it on a huge six story screen. Oblivion, on the other hand, is very impressive in that respect, particularly in the last couple minutes, when the audience gets to glimpse inside the triangular mother ship that is constantly floating in the sky. The plot is also a strongpoint of the movie, being very original and at the same time paying homage to old classics. Throughout the film, many references are scattered to classic science fiction films, particularly to Star Wars and 2001. Those were employed very subtly and very cleverly. The director also did a nice job of creating a distinct tone. The film isn't without problems, however. The screenplay is not the best, and some of the actors are miscast. Morgan Freeman in particular doesn't fit the role, and accordingly gives what I would consider a bad performance. Also, a lot more is given away in the advertising than I would have liked. Don't worry, there are still plenty of surprises in store, but it just would have been that much better if they didn't give away anything. Tom Cruise is actually alright in this, giving what is probably his only good performance since Eyes Wide Shut. Overall, I would highly recommend seeing this.
8/10
8/10
Sunday, April 21, 2013
The Place Beyond the Pines
Spanning several generations and almost three decades, The Place Beyond the Pines is a cinematic achievement of epic proportions. The film follows a motorcycle stuntman turned bank robber trying to provide for his newfound family (played by Ryan Gosling), an honest hero cop trying to deal with a corrupt police department (played by Bradley Cooper), and later focuses on their sons (played by Dane DeHaan and Emory Cohen). This familial saga is about the sins of the fathers haunting the next generations of the family. As you've probably already guessed, I liked the movie. I liked it a lot. It's refreshing after some of the crap we've been getting in theaters lately. Director Derek Cianfrance sets a mood that feels very surreal or even hallucinatory, and he does this very well. Here is a director that knows what he is doing. I look forward to his future work. He also draws some very good performances from the more than capable ensemble of actors. Ryan Gosling gives an oscar worthy performance as a passionate father who would do almost anything to help his son have a better life, and Cooper is also particularly effective as a much less passionate father. Eva Mendes, playing Ramona, Gosling's character's ex lover and the mother of his newborn son, is a very caring mother indeed, trying simply to make a good life for her son. Newcomers Emory Cohen and Dane Dehaan prove themselves worthy of standing next to actors of the stature of Gosling and Cooper, Cohen's performance resembling that of Joaquin Phoenix's in The Master. The musical score is mesmerizing, cinematography looks fine, and it is written very well. Overall, a job well done.
9/10
9/10
Friday, April 19, 2013
42
6.5/10
The Call
After winning her Oscar, Halle Berry has made some of the worst career choices she could possibly make. In everything from Catwoman to Movie 43, she proved that she could just as easily win a Razzie as well as an Oscar. Now, hoping to regain A-list status, she agrees to star in The Call. This intense drama is made from the point of view of a 911 operative, and focuses on a case where a girl was kidnapped and stuffed into the trunk of a car. Strangely enough, the kidnapper doesn't take her cell phone, and she manages to call 911. Over the course of the movie, Halle Berry and the cops attempt to locate her while trying to discover who exactly is behind this heinous crime. So is it any good? Not really. I mean, it starts off rather well. The director was able to keep tension, and there was some interesting insight into how 911 operators work. Some of the writing was a bit cheesy, but nothing too bad. The first two thirds or so were decent, and Halle Berry was surprisingly good. Nothing Oscar-worthy, and she definitely has a lot of work ahead of her if she wants to become an A-lister again, but she has started the climb up toward to redemption. I must also commend Michael Ekland who did very well as the kidnapper. The script does not give him a lot to work from, and he did very well with what he had to work with. However, the movie greatly suffers towards the end. When the conclusion starts approaching, the film blatantly rips off the last scenes in the serial killer's house from The Silence of the Lambs, which doesn't make any sense in this movie. In Silence, Clarice was an FBI agent, so of course she would go investigate by herself. But in this movie, Berry is a 911 operative, someone who would not go around investigating. And the ending was complete bullshit. The Call is mostly a decent thriller, but has a shitty third act and some bad writing. The Call gets a...
5.5/10
Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counsellor
1/10
The Deer Hunter
So after much contemplation, I finally decided to start a blog on which I write reviews of contemporary and classic films. And what better way to start off than the Vietnam War classic, The Deer Hunter. This film is an emotionally devastating experience and features some of the most accurate depictions of the Vietnam War in film. The plot is fairly simple; a trio of Russian-American friends, Michael (Robert De Niro), Nick (Christopher Walken), and Steven (John Savage), join the U.S. Army in the midst of the Vietnam War, and are captured by the Viet Cong. They are then forced to play Russian Roulette by their captors. The Russian Roulette scene is probably the most intense sequence in cinema history. I found that during the course of this scene, I was immobilized. I sat staring at the screen in anticipation, afraid of what might happen next. The reason for the intensity is that the movie spends the first hour and a half getting to know these characters. We are introduced to their families and their lovers, and to their way of life, so by the time the scenes of imprisonment come by, we know these people as if they were our own close friends, and that makes it a particularly painful. The film is very well photographed, and despite some strange editing choices in the beggining, still comes across as a very personal statement about friendship and war. The acting is all first rate. John Savage is effective as the wounded soldier Steven, Christopher Walken gives a riveting performance worthy of the Oscar it won, and Robert De Niro is great as the war-torn leader of their "clan". Meryl Streep appears in the film as well as Nick's emotionally battered lover, and gives an Oscar worthy performance. I also must commend director Michael Cimino, who not only crafted one of the greatest anti-war films ever made, but also portrayed the Russian-American culture very realistically. I was raised in that culture, and I can safely say, this is the most accurate portrayal of Russian culture on film. The man definitely did his homework. So for these reasons, I will give The Deer Hunter a...
10/10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)